Beyer Tweaking Figs for Synthetic Surfaces
It has been reported in Daily Racing Form that Andy Beyer and his team are adjusting their ratings for Synthetic race surfaces. They might have finally figured out that they can't use the same formula that creates their natural dirt figures for races run over Synthetic surfaces. For that matter they should also re-adjust their formula for turf races.
Now don't get me wrong, I respect Andy Beyer and his work. After all he created a rating that most of the Thoroughbred racing industry and most handicappers use or have used to some extent. To me that's simply genius.
However there are holes in his ratings and these holes have been most evident through the years when dealing with grass surfaces and currently even more evident when considered over Synthetic surfaces.
And after reading the Daily Racing Form article as to how Beyer is going to adjust his figures it seems that even after the adjustments are made his ratings will still be dramatically off.
I just can't see how one can use a blanket formula to create figures for 3 different racing surfaces. Think about it.
To start, horses are asked to run differently over each surface. The pace scenario's are different, the way the Jockey's ride on each surface greatly differ especially when considering the strategy's being applied.
So how could one mathematical formula cover 3 basically different racing surfaces? Clearly Beyer's ratings work best on natural dirt. Then they lose their consistency and tail off when considering grass surfaces. Then they lose even more of their power over Synthetic surfaces.
Two quick examples:
Pioneerof The Nile. His Beyer numbers heading into the Derby read as if he were a longshot at best. However he recorded one of the fastest 1 1/8th mile preps within the entire derby field and went on to finish 2nd. Clearly his Beyer ratings should have reflected such an effort/race and they didn't.
The same sort of thing appeared in the past performances of Street Sense when he won his derby. Reading his past performances you will see that for his races on Synthetic surfaces his Beyers dipped way too low. Then for his Natural dirt efforts his Beyers shot through the roof. This just isn't possible.
At this point what I would advise a handicapper to do while while using Beyer figures is to try and keep in mind that there should be 3 types of ratings within these figures for the 3 basic racing surfaces. Once you get a grip on that logic you'll then have to find a way to evaluate these figures and level the playing field.
Right now on the Beyer scale a rating of 90 on natural dirt - a rating of 90 on a Synthetic surface - a 90 rating on grass does not mean these 3 horses ran just as fast as each other or even gave a similar effort.
Onward!
Labels: Beyer Adjusts His Figures


8 Comments:
Hey Nick,
Couldn't agree with you more. I've been critical of the synthetic Beyers ever since the 2007 Blue Grass. The fact is : final time is pretty much irrelevant on synthetics. While I bristle at those who say synthetic racing is just another form of grass racing, there is the important similarities in that turn of foot is more important on those surfaces than on dirt and lack of early speed is not a complete killer. I lean heavily on final fractions when handicapping synthetic runners and use a little common sense when evaluating horses going to or coming off synthetics.
I think you hit the nail on the head with your comments.
I remember seeing that Blue Grass and after I saw the finishing fraction they came home in I knew the Derby winner was coming out of that field.
Do you remember the column Beyer wrote right after that Blue Grass? The gist was that and the new Keeneland were a joke. That it completely muddled the Derby handicapping waters. Well I wrote a letter to DRF in response. In it I wrote that to me the race made complete sense. Dominican, the horse for course, won. Expect him to regress in the Derby. Tuefflesberg had the easy lead he needed and ran his top race because of it. Previously he had run a 100 Beyer under ideal circumstances. Great Hunter I said was probably not a top flight horse. And as for STreet Sense it was the perfect prep and expect him to be primed perfectly for the Derby. I also asked how that running was less legit than the year Sinister Minister wom with his huge figure. I then suggested that maybe something more like a timeform rating might not be a better guage for synthetic performances.
I haven't changed my mind. This new tweek is not the answer. All you have to know is that the Pamplemouse has been upgraed to a 107. He was the most overrated horse on the Derby trail. Beating Take the Points, this year's Sam P, in the manner he did made him a mediocre Grade III type at best. And I think his final eighth was 12.4. Pioneer of the Nile would have had him for lunch in the SA Derby.
Again, you're dead on. I agree with all you said.
It's funny but the best thing that will come from this new Beyer adjustment will be the creation of even more loop-holes within the figures. This will create even more double digit winners discovered by guys that are aware of what is actually going on with these false figures.
So just keep enjoying the ride.
From a pari-mutual standpoint you're dead on. I think the way the debate has been shaped, though, has hurt the sport. There's a large contingent that views the synthetic results as illegit. Take last year's BC Classic for example. The idea the Curlin was done in solely by the Pro-Ride. Fact is he was not the same horse in the fall of last year that he had been. His less than stellar form coupled with the trip West is what did him in. Yeah, if the race had been run in NY he probably wins. PROBABLY. But then again, Raven's Pass was bred well enough for dirt. And Sakhee and Giant's Causeway each came within a nose of Tiznow, a horse I would take under almpst any circumstances vs. Curlin.
Yup, I felt the same way about Curlin. I thought he was a tired horse at that point headed into the Breeders' Cup. I also thought he moved too soon during the running of the race. Either way I didn't think he would win.
People forget that the Synthetic surface was introduced to aid the horses. So if it works to help them - then we need it.
Handicappers just have to learn how to handicap the new surface. Between now and then cash all the tickets you can!
Please, for the love of God, learn how to use apostrophes correctly!
More specifically, learn the difference between the possessive (use apostrophe) and the plural (do not use apostrophe).
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home