Got an email from a client that asked
why did I like Pioneerof The Nile so much if I gave out I Want Revenge as my first choice. I guess he is referring to my prior Blog post about Pioneer and how he was faster than most of the field while still running on Synthetics.
Well I gave out Pioneer as my second choice in my race analysis and yes, Revenge was my first choice.
The reason I picked I Want Revenge first is - to start he had battled Pioneer back in California on Synthetic and lost to him twice through very big efforts. So Revenge showed a lot of heart and ability just as Pioneer did.
Except that Revenge was being brought along much slower as compared to Pioneer so I felt Pioneer had an early edge in these California races. And for Revenge to be able to finish so close to Pioneer made me feel that with some more seasoning he could beat him.
When Revenge came to New York and ran on Natural dirt he seemed to be a better horse. He had Blinkers added for his last race in California and when he won the Wood after having all that trouble he made me a believer.
He won a race where he got left at the gate and was blocked on the turn, had to go between horses and won without having been touched with the whip.
So at this point I felt he was at the top of his game and finally matured into the potential he had always shown. On the other hand, Pioneer had always been good but his last race in California proved to me he was a grinder. Very good but perhaps not brilliant.
To me Revenge showed more brilliance in his running line in The Wood. And that's why I went with Revenge on top.
And after he scratched, the analysis I offered on the race pointed to Pionerof The Nile becoming the selection. And at that point I was very comfortable with Pioneer being my new top selection.
Well, we almost pulled it off.
Hey, did anyone back-wheel Pioneer to catch the Exacta?
Labels: Scratches and second selections